Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Simply Roses

As exciting and interesting as some flower combinations can be, I will forever love roses…no need for fillers or fluff…

2 megan w blog phpptpgraphyimage via Megan W Photography

3N7E2008-590x885 absolutely lovedimage via Absolutely Loved

6a01156ed03c2b970c01348024ac26970c-800w  creative mintiimage via A Creative Mint

6a010534a9832e970b010536d83e96970b yvonne designimage via Yvonne Design

037-360x500 floral art vermontimage via Floral Artistry

Blushing-Beauties martha stewartimage via Martha Stewart

Contracts_shots_004 wild at heart nikki tibblesimage via Wild at Heart

ec_01 jeff greenoughimage via Jeff Greenough Photography

JEM_5792 enchanted floristimage via Enchanted Florist

tt-013 marlin munoz photoimage via Marlin Munoz Photography

  Anyone else love monobotanical bouquets of roses? Some people tell me they don’t like roses because they’re overused…I think they’re just overcombined (I just made up a word!) with other flowers…sometimes beauty is in simplicity…

Happy Wednesday…in a few hours!

3 comments:

Erratt Family said...

I love roses, but I grew up around them. Perhaps that makes me better appreciate their complexity and differences. I still find it difficult to believe that a person would say they "dislike all roses" because there are so many types and textures and colors.

Jenny said...

that second to last picture is the only time I've liked the petals flipped back...probably has to do with the color. I think you are completely right about the "overcombined" thing. What's not to love?

Never A Plain Jane said...

That Floral Artistry photo took my breath away and I am definitely from the camp that doesn't love roses. I like them, but they aren't at the top of my list. But those ruffled petals won me over today!